Sunday, January 15, 2017

Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald Discuss Deep State War Vs. Trump, While Ex-Spook Hints At Assassination


Journalist Glenn Greenwald, who is not a fan of President-elect Trump, appeared on Tucker Carlson tonight to discuss the dangerous ongoing effort among powerful anti-Trump factions within the US Government's "Deep State," who have collaborated with members of the Democratic Party and the traditionally liberal media to inflict maximum damage on the incoming President. 

Recall Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's ominous "six ways from Sunday" comment from 10 days ago. 

Greenwald, an accomplished litigator, journalist, and author, does a masterful job illustrating the players, motives, and potential fallout from this dangerous effort within the US Government's intelligence apparatus. Greenwald goes deep, discussing how Trump's election ruined the plan for regime change in Syria, specifically mentioning, among other things, that the deep state was waiting for Obama to leave office before executing their plan:
The number one foreign policy priority of the CIA over the last four to five years has been the proxy war they're waging in Syria to remove Bashar Al Assad - and Hillary Clinton was quite critical of Obama for constraining them. She wanted to escalate that war to unleash the CIA, to impose a no-fly zone in Syria to confront Russia, whereas Trump took the exact opposite position. He said we have no business in Syria trying to change the government, we ought to let the Russia and Assad go free and killing ISIS and Al Quaeda and whoever else they want to kill.

He [Trump] was a threat to the CIA's primary institutional priority of regime change in Syria. Beyond that, Clinton wanted a much more confrontational and belligerent posture towards Moscow, which the CIA has been acrimonious with for decades, whereas Trump wanted better relations. They viewed Trump as a threat to their institutional pre-eminence to their ability to get their agenda imposed on Washington.
What you're seeing is actually quite dangerous. There really is at this point obvious open warefare between this un-elected, but very powerful faction that resides in Washington and sees Presidents come and go - on the one hand, and the person that the American democracy elected to be elected on the other. There's clearly extreme conflict and subversion taking place. '
This really is a must-watch, and goes hand-in-hand with Tucker's interview with Dr. Stephen Cohen this week:

Meanwhile ex-spook and security consultant John Schindler - who is very clearly part of the faction to remove Trump by any means, sent out a tweet yesterday which mentioned "taking traitor Trump out now." 


This is overt, and Schindler also just more or less outed Washington Post's David Ignatius as a CIA mouthpiece (along the same vein as Deep Throat, perhaps we can refer to Ignatius's source as Golden Shower?).

This cavalier attitude towards assassinating Donald Trump has been supported by social media giant Facebook:

And nothing, to the best of my knowledge, has been done about the multitude of death threats Trump has received - including ones from individuals who have visited the White House and have CIA connections.


Meanwhile 8 years ago, a La Mesa, California man was charged, arrested, and thrown in a halfway house for 60 days for going on a drunken, racist, profanity laced online tirade against President-elect Obama ending in "he will have a 50 cal in the head soon." - a conviction which was later reversed when the threats were found to be not credible.
Perhaps the secret service is merely spread too thin to investigate these threats, or perhaps President-elect Trump is wise to have his own private security.

Saturday, January 14, 2017

Proof Of George Soros Nazi Past Finally Comes To Light With Discovery Of Forgotten Interview

Nazi collaborator Soros gave MILLIONS to Hillary Clinton’s failed campaign

George Soros has repeatedly called 1944 "The Best Year of his Life." 70% of Mr. Soros's fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year, yet he gives no sign that this put any damper on his elation, either at the time or indeed in retrospect.

Friday, January 13, 2017

Marxist Radicals Plan To Disrupt Trump Inauguration… Party Outside Pence’s Home [AUDIO]


Once again, my long time friend and colleague, Trevor Loudon, has uncovered plans by the radical left to create mayhem.

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Sunday, January 1, 2017

Van Jones Goes Full Commie: Radical Leftists Are The New Leaders Of The Democrat Party

This has been a long time coming for the Democrats.  Coming out of the closet is right up their alley.  No doubt that they have felt emboldened at how well an open and avowed Socialist like Bernie Sanders can do in running for the highest office in the land, while the right gave almost no push back to the very idea that a Socialist (aka, communist-lite) could lead America.  Having managed to put Marxists in key roles inside major media including news, television, newspapers, websites, feature films, colleges and high schools....they know that there will be almost no push back allowed. -W.E. 

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Anonymous The “RUSSIAN HACKING” of DNC Emails

"With regard to the hacking of the Democratic National Committee allegedly by President Putin, lest we forget, the leaked emails revealed that the DNC was busy undermining Bernie Sanders candidacy through the primaries by various corrupt and fraudulent practices including smear campaigns directed against Bernie.  Russia had nothing to do with this process. It was inside the Democratic Party.  The main actor was not Moscow it was the DNC, including meddling by Hillary Clinton and the DNC Chair Debbie Wassermann-Shultz.  The underlying objective was to discredit Sanders with a view to upholding Clinton who has a criminal record with the FBI.  The emails revealed certain corrupt and unsavory DNC activities in support of Hillary Clinton's candidacy.  If these DNC dirty tricks in favor of Hillary had not been carried out, Bernie Sanders would most probably have won the Democratic Party nomination.  The DNC is responsible for its own failures, the email leaks were not the result of hacking ordered by President Putin, quite the opposite. 

Thursday, December 29, 2016

8 years Under Our '1st Muslim President'


By Wayne Allyn Root

Remember when President Bill Clinton was called “America’s first black president”? Obviously, it wasn’t because he was black. But Clinton had an affinity for black people, and his actions were beneficial to blacks (or so they thought). Hence the branding as “America’s first black president.” The tag stuck.

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Lt. Colonel Sums Up Obama’s Mid-East Policy: ‘Praise Islam, Ignore Christians, Blame Jews’

Excellent summation of Obama's policy in the Middle-East.  Where I would depart with Peters is that Obama is "naive" when it comes to Islam.  That is an absurd statement on its face when we consider that the vast majority of his family, perhaps his mother excluded, are Wahhabi Muslims which is one of the most radial forms of Islam.  He himself is either a Muslim....which in my opinion is likely or at the very least, very sympathetic to Islam itself. 

Friday, December 23, 2016

The Real Russian Agent


Liberal Democrats have been so busy accusing Donald J. Trump of being a Russian agent that they have missed the real Russian agent on the international scene—Germany’s Angela Merkel.  

Sunday, December 18, 2016

9 Points of Forgery: Obama BC Fraud PROVEN! 3-Minute Synopsis

If you haven't seen the Arapaio/Zullo press conference this past week go here

The conclusion is 9 Points of Forgery
Regarding Barry Soetoro's birth certificate, it is what its always has been, a fraudulent document, and the proof is incontrovertible. -W.E. 

Megyn Kelly Rebuked For ‘Placating To the Left’

Many will recall a couple of weeks before the election speaking with Newt Gingrich and being quite provocative, at the very least, Kelly suggested that Trump was a "sexual predator".  She had also taken every opportunity should could to show over and over the Access Hollywood tape to the point where it was hard not to believe she was pulling for Hillary in the same way, only in clandestine fashion, that Hannity pulled for TrumpThen, last week she totally misrepresented what turned out to be a PizzaGate fluff piece, nothing "fair and balanced" about it. 
These are just a few examples of many.  To be fair, she has done some good work I have to give her that, but now going after Pam Geller in the fashion she has, with the large reach that she has, - terrible-W.E. 


Host of the TheBlaze TV’s Tomi Lahren blasted Megyn Kelly on Monday for constantly “placating to the left” at the expense of alienating conservatives and Trump supporters.

Lahren pointed out that she has refrained from opining Megyn Kelly Fox News, despite the Fox News’ star controversial feud with then Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
But when Kelly smeared Pamela Geller during an interview last week, Lahren explained, Kelly crossed the line.

Geller “is no question a hateful person who held this ‘Draw Muhammad’ contest down in Texas,” Kelly said.  “And then they got attacked by two terrorists. Now she is a provocateur, and she is not a fan of anyone who is Muslim from the sound of what she says. But this is America and she has the right to say those things.”

“I’ve been rather quiet about Megyn Kelly throughout this election cycle,” Lahren said. “She does her thing and speaks her truth and that’s all fine and dandy, even if it has alienated a lot of Trump supporters—that’s on her. But where does she get off saying this?”

Lahren featured Geller on her show to set the record straight in light of Kelly’s berating remarks. 
Geller said Kelly has no understanding of freedom of speech is only trying to cater to leftists for opportunistic reasons.

“I have to think, well what has Megyn Kelly done for Muslim girls who are in trouble, who want to live free lives?” Geller asked. “I find it shocking that she A) considers herself a journalist when she knows nothing of my work. B) Smears, defames and libels me, why? Because she’s so eager to move to NBC, ABC, or CBS or one of those last vestiges of ‘ the gold standard of journalism?’ And honestly, if that’s the standard of journalism where we are now then she clearly belongs in one of those cesspools, and they are cesspools because they smear and they defame people. And she owes me an apology.”

Lahren wondered whether Kelly is intentionally trying to alienate conservatives as part of a way to get more attention from the liberal media or is just showing her true colors.

“It’s so weird to me because listening to that [interview], of course from NPR, of all places, if I were to close my eyes and I wouldn’t have looked at any photos and I wouldn’t have known whose voice it was, I would have sworn that that was a liberal,” Lahren said. “I wouldn’t have thought it was going to come from Fox News’ Megyn Kelly. But you know she’s done some very surprising things this year, that I’m rather confused about. I’m not sure if she’s purposely alienating conservatives, purposely alienating Trump supporters. But I don’t know if she’s doing herself a whole lot of favors. Especially by going after you in a meritless way.”

The ‘Draw Muhammad’ art exhibit that she hosted in Texas, Geller said, was about taking a stand for free speech in light of the Charlie Hedo attack.

Lahren said she was appalled that Kelly attacked Geller for defending the First Amendment, rather than denouncing defenders of Sharia law.

“The last time a Christian drew Jesus, or a non-Christian drew Jesus, or a Christian drew a Jew, or any of that, no one died. There wasn’t a terrorist attack,” Lahren said. “I am wondering if she understands the jihadi threat to this nation, or if she is glossing over it like the rest of the mainstream.”

Friday, December 16, 2016

MORE ARPAIO PROOF: Fake Birth Certificate = Fake POTUS

President Barack Obama's birth certificate has been determined by two outside world class document examiners using forensic science to be forgeries.   

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Arpaio & Zullo: Final Press Conference [Thursday] Will Completely Blow Lid Off of Obama’s Fraudulent Documents


Livestream of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s 12-15-16 Press Conference



Monday, December 12, 2016

The CIA’s War on Trump

President Kennedy proclaimed that he would “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds” (17 months before getting shot, a still unsolved murder).

Operation Mockingbird was a bit of a two-pronged approach to dealing with the media: on the one hand, journalists were routinely employed by the CIA to develop intelligence and gather information, or to report on certain events in a way that portrayed the US favorably. On the other, there were actual plants within the media—paid off with bribes or even directly employed by the CIA—to feed propaganda to the American public.

Operation Paperclip.  MKUltra.  Operation Mockingbird. Black Ops and Regime Change Programs. Fake Benghazi "video".
In many ways the CIA represents "the swamp".  And that swamp runs deep and wide since its very inception and will not be "drained" without a fight.  -W.E.


You couldn’t fault Donald J. Trump for concluding that the CIA is out to get him even before he starts his presidency. 

Former CIA officials Michael Morell, Michael Hayden and Philip Mudd have all denounced him. Plus, former CIA operations officer Evan McMullin ran against him as an independent presidential candidate.

Obama’s director of the CIA is John Brennan, who recently disclosed that he voted for the Communist Party (CPUSA) ticket when he was in college. He was hired by the CIA anyway and quickly rose through the ranks, even though the CPUSA was funded by Moscow and known to provide cover for Soviet espionage activities.

The liberal media haven’t made Brennan’s disclosure into a scandal and didn’t call for any investigations of Obama’s CIA.

Clearly, having an “intelligence” connection doesn’t mean you are intelligent or have good judgment. Making “America First” is not a requirement for serving in the CIA and other intelligence agencies. You can have numerous skeletons in your closet and even be a transgender. If you have any doubts, consider reading the CIA’s “Diversity and Inclusion Strategy (2016-2019).” It is Brennan’s masterpiece.

The line-up of former CIA personnel opposing Trump sounds impressive, except when you consider the fact that the CIA has a habit of getting things wrong. Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a former vice-chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, once declared that “for a quarter century, the CIA has been repeatedly wrong about the major political and economic questions entrusted to its analysis.” Moynihan had introduced a bill to abolish the CIA. The late Lt. Gen. William Odom, then-director of the National Security Agency (NSA), said the CIA should be disbanded.

Trump critic Michael Hayden, who served as director of both the NSA and CIA, was on a list of “former national security officials” from Republican administrations who announced they wouldn’t vote for Trump. He was once photographed at a gala with former CIA and NSA analyst Edward Snowden, who stole and released classified information and is now living in Russia. Hayden can’t be faulted personally for that betrayal. But Snowden and other spy cases have to be considered when judging the reliability of products from the intelligence community, especially when they are transmitted anonymously through the press.

Under the headline, “CIA Judgment On Russia Built On Swell Of Evidence,” The New York Times reports that “many believe” there is “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” that the Russians tried to help Trump. The paper said “the conclusion that Moscow ran an operation to help install the next president is one of the most consequential analyses by American spy agencies in years.”

Such analyses can mean nothing and can, in fact, divert the attention of elected officials from the truth. Trump calls the verdict on alleged Russian involvement in the election “ridiculous.” It would not be the first ridiculous work product from the intelligence community. The CIA failed to predict the Soviet “collapse,” and then mistakenly assumed the collapse was real and not a strategic deception.

It is significant that The Washington Post, owned by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos, broke the story about the CIA allegedly concluding that the Russians had somehow meddled in the U.S. elections by hacking into Democratic Party computers. The CIA has a $600 million contract with Amazon Web Services.

Former Post publisher Katharine Graham reportedly gave a speech in 1988 at the CIA headquarters, where she said, “We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things that the general public does not need to know and shouldn’t. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.”

If this was the case under Graham, the previous owner of the Post, how likely is it that such a relationship continues under an owner of a company that does business with the CIA?

Interestingly, Amazon CEO Bezos plans to attend President-elect Donald Trump’s meeting of tech-industry executives this Wednesday in New York. Perhaps Trump will ask Bezos whether the Post is being manipulated by political partisans in the Intelligence Community.
Trump has tweeted, “Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!” Or “fake news.”
In response to the CIA’s reported findings, the Trump transition office raised the matter of another mistake: “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”
The discredited analysis concluding that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is most closely associated with former CIA director George Tenet. A Clinton holdover, Tenet had told President George W. Bush that finding WMD was a “slam dunk.” He was photographed giving an award to then-DIA intelligence analyst Ana Montes, who turned out to be a Castro spy. Again, Tenet is not personally responsible for this betrayal. But it is one of many spy cases that have corrupted the Intelligence Community.
President Bush’s problem was that he failed to clean house in the Intelligence Community before the war.
After he takes office, Trump should immediately clean house in the CIA and other intelligence agencies. But it may be the case that the charges being directed against him at the present time are designed to prevent just that. If Trump cleans house, he will be accused in the press of trying to purge intelligence officials with evidence of a Russian plot to elect Trump!
The American people have been saddled with an Intelligence Community that is full of what are called “insider spies.” The situation is so bad that a special paper has been published about a novel new way to deal with traitors. The idea is to provide a “safe refuge” and a secret process of “reconciliation” for them without threatening long prison terms or the death penalty. In this manner, the American people would hear nothing about spies being arrested and the damage they have done.

We know that the media picked sides in the presidential contest. Now we are seeing more evidence of how the CIA picked sides, to the point of engaging in what is an obvious effort to bring down the Trump presidency even before it begins.