Since the bizarre death of founder Andrew Breitbart, the conspiracy theorist in me has been suspicious of the direction Breitbart took in two regards. First, they, like the rest of the media save WND and some conservative websites REFUSED to even question (is that not a journalists' job?) the death of Andrew Breitbart as being anything other than "natural causes" despite any number of factors including Breitbart's age, reports of the poisoning of Breitbart's alleged coroner and Breitbart's own words that he would, for the first time truly be "vetting Obama" and had "videos" (motive?). 
Second, as in this article, Breitbart.com seem to have Obama's back when it comes to the eligibility issue, even going out of their way to NOT question Obama's eligibility even when they themselves broke the "Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii'" story. 
Here is my partial comment to that story (or you can find whole article here)

A forward to this Breitbart article (below), which I did not include, goes out of the way to say that Andrew Breitbart was not a "birther" and that the article is not intended to promote "birtherism" but rather:

 " It is evidence--not of the President's foreign origin, but that Barack Obama's public persona has perhaps been presented differently at different times."

To which I add, "BOLOGNA!" This is indeed more evidence (circumstantial as it may be) that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen, and there are people close to him that know this.   According to WND, Andrew Breitbart had a video that he was about to release and he told WND that it had to do with Obama talking to Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers at Harvard plotting Revolution. After Breitbart's suspicious death, no such video was released, but instead a video that was much less incendiary and never gained real traction in the national media.  Despite a suspicious death of an individual within the coroner's office on the day the cause of Breitbart's death was made public, and despite several other questionable details in Breitbart's death, BREITBART.COM has gone out of the way to shrug this off.  

Here is my conjecture; The editors at Breitbart.com have been spooked into silence when it comes to Obama's eligibility or any real revelation that is profound enough to end Obama's Presidency completely if not immediately.

And my opinion has not changed. Certainly if the Republican party ever purposely  ran a candidate for the office of President that was not constitutionally eligible regarding citizenship status, they would never again be in position to even bring up Obama's perpetrated fraud without indicting themselves too.  The communistic Democratic Party must love this. Of course, the way things are going with the Republican Party, it is absurd to think questions will ever be asked anyway.  -W.E. 


Again, the U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. What complete madness to suggest someone born in another country is somehow a "natural born Citizen" of the United States and eligible to be POTUS. It is complete rubbish and they know it. Harvard educated attorney and law professor Herb Titus confirms that a "natural born Citizen" is one born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen parents. This is elementary stuff. Just read Article II yourself and it is clear as day that a "citizen" and "natural born Citizen" are very much different.  

by Ken Klukowski @ Breitbart ( Hat tip Julio )
On Mar. 8, reporter Carl Cameron on Special Report on Fox News Channel was surveying potential GOP 2016 presidential candidates. Then he raised Ted Cruz--one of the most brilliant constitutional lawyers ever to serve in the Senate--the new 41-year old Hispanic senator from Texas.

Cameron added, “But Cruz was born in Canada and is constitutionally ineligible” to run for president. While many people assume that, it’s probably not true.

Cameron was referring to the Constitution’s Article II requirement that only a “natural born citizen” can run for the White House.

No one is certain what that means. Citizenship was primarily defined by each state when the Constitution was adopted. Federal citizenship wasn't clearly established until the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868. The Constitution is not clear whether it means you must be born on U.S. soil, or instead whether you must be born a U.S. citizen.

CONTINUED HERE: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/03/11/Yes-Ted-Cruz-Likely-Eligible-to-be-President

REALITY: Constitutional Law Professor Herb Titus Explains What Natural Born Citizen Really Means - VIDEO HERE.

FLASHBACK: Audio: Fox News Declares Senator Ted Cruz Ineligible To Be President Due To Birth In Canada - VIDEO HERE.

FLASHBACK: Video: Sean Hannity Declares Canadian-Born Ted Cruz Eligible To Be President; Cruz Dodges - VIDEO HERE.

PREVIOUS REPORTS: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Ted+Cruz

LEARN THE TRUE MEANING OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Most Viewed This Week