"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague." -Cicero
“Radical” is such a ridiculous adjective. it is pure Islam,
authentic Islam – there is nothing radical or unIslamic about jihad.
Obama’s father was a Muslims which de facto makes him a
Muslim and he is considered Muslim in the Muslim world. Take for example Meriam
Ibrahim. Her mother was Christian and raised her a Christian. She married a
Christian, lives in America and has Christian children. But when she returned
to Sudan to visit family, she was arrested for “apostasy” in other words for
leaving Islam. She was nine months pregnat and forced togive birth with her
legs shackled leaving her baby deformed. This is Islamic law. She is considered
a Muslim even though she has never been a Muslim.
Obama, on the other hand, was raised a Muslim, went to
Islamic school in an Islamic country (Indonesia) from the ages of six to
eleven. He was tops in his quran class.
Obama was “previously
quite religious in Islam.”
He is pro-jihad and it is clear in his foreign policy.
There’s a reason he attacks and punishes Israel while
allowing the Islamic State to grow and conquer.
It’s interesting that the Examiner is actually running this
story. They won’t run my columns or any of the articles I have submitted to
them over the years. Don’t you love these right of center publications
and bloggers (like Michelle Malkin) that have shunned my work and Robert
Spencer’s but when jihad breaks out they are all jihad-wild. The National
Review actually has a ban on scholar Robert Spencer. Shame on them and all the
other imposters that are writing about this now without the proper mea culpas.
“EX-CIA employee admits President Obama is a radical Islamic
enemy of America,” The Examiner, August 31, 2014
[It’s] an explosive charge, one that practically accuses the
president of treason.
Today, a former CIA agent bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that America has
switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was
willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but
declined to say on-the-record.
Clare M. Lopez is the Vice President for Research and Analysis at
the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the
London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute. Since
2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. Also
Vice President of the Intelligence Summit, she formerly was a career operations
officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Centre for
Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy
Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst,
and researcher for a variety of defense firms. She was named a Lincoln Fellow
at the Claremont Institute in 2011.
Lopez said the global war on terror had been an effort to
“stay free of Shariah,” or repressive Islamic law, until the Obama administration
began siding with such jihadist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood and its
affiliates. Lopez believes that the Muslim Brotherhood has thoroughly
infiltrated the Obama administration and other branches of the federal government. One of the most
outrageous of those appointments is Mohamed Elibiary, a senior member of the Department of Homeland
Security Advisory Council. According to a report by the Center for Security
Policy, Elibiary supports brokering a U.S. partnership with the Muslim
Brotherhood terrorist group. Two months ago, a firestorm erupted online after Elibiary tweeted that a “Caliphate” is
inevitable and compared it to the European Union.
Ms. Lopez also believes Obama had essentially the same goals in the Mideast as the
late Osama bin Laden: “to remove American power and influence, including
military forces, from Islamic lands.” The former CIA operative’s perspective
affects her prescription for what the U.S. should do about the terror army ISIS, as she called for caution
While there has been a sudden chorus of politicians and
military experts calling for the immediate elimination of the terrorist army
after it beheaded American journalist James Foley last week, Lopez believes the
U.S. should have an overall strategy in place before fully re-engaging in the Mideast
militarily.Any military action would be further complicated, she told WND, if
it were not clear which side the U.S. is on, either in the short term or in the
overall war on terror.
Lopez felt it was impossible to understand why the president
and some of his top appointees, such as CIA Director John Brennan, who is
believed to be a Muslim convert, “consistently seem to apologize for Islam,
even in the face of such atrocities as the Foley beheading,” adding, they “take
pains to assure the world they don’t think IS, (or the Islamic State, also
called ISIS) or whichever perpetrator it was, has anything to do with Islam.
How can they possibly believe that genuinely when everything these jihadis do
tracks directly to the literal text of Quran, hadiths and Shariah?”
“In any case, and for whatever motivations, there is no
doubt this administration switched sides in what used to be called the Global War on
Terror,” she said.
I wonder if those who don’t want to go ‘on the record’ will
finally speak out.